Bioregionalism

Bioregionalism is a political, cultural, and ecological system or set of views based on naturally defined areas called bioregions, similar to ecoregions. Bioregions are defined through physical and environmental features, including watershed boundaries and soil and terrain characteristics. Bioregionalism stresses that the determination of a bioregion is also a cultural phenomenon, and emphasizes local populations, knowledge, and solutions.[1]

Bioregionalism is a concept that goes beyond national boundaries—an example is the concept of Cascadia, a region that is sometimes considered to consist of the western halves of Oregon and Washington, the Alaska Panhandle, the far north of California and the West Coast of Canada. [2] Another example of a bioregion, which does not cross national boundaries, but does overlap state lines, is the Ozarks, a bioregion also referred to as the Ozarks Plateau, which consists of southern Missouri, northwest Arkansas, the northeast corner of Oklahoma, southwest corner of Kansas.[3]

Contents

Overview

The term appears to have originated in work by Peter Berg and Raymond Dasmann in the early 1970s,[4] and has been advocated by writers such as Kirkpatrick Sale.[5]

The bioregionalist perspective opposes a homogeneous economy and consumer culture with its lack of stewardship towards the environment. This perspective seeks to:

Relationship to environmentalism

Bioregionalism, while akin to environmentalism in certain aspects, such as a desire to live in harmony with nature, differs in certain ways from classical, 20th century environmentalism. [8]

According to Peter Berg, bioregionalism is proactive, and is based on forming a harmony between human culture and the natural environment, rather than being protest-based like the original environmental movement. Also, while classical environmentalists saw human industry as the enemy of nature and nature as a victim needing to be saved; bioregionalists see humanity and its culture as a part of nature, focusing on building a positive, sustainable relationship with the environment, rather than a focus on preserving and segregating the wilderness from the world of humanity. [9]

In politics

North American Bioregional Assemblies have been bi-annual gatherings of bioregionalists throughout North America since 1984 and have given rise to national level Green Parties. In addition, bioregionalism spawned the sustainability movement. The tenets of bioregionalism are often used by green movements, which oppose political organizations whose boundaries conform to existing electoral districts. This problem is perceived to result in elected representatives voting in accordance with their constituents, some of whom may live outside a defined bioregion, and may run counter to the well-being of the bioregion.

See also

References

  1. ^ "Bioregionalism: The Need For a Firmer Theoretical Foundation", Don Alexander, Trumpeter v13.3, 1996.
  2. ^ http://www.cascadiaprospectus.org/2010/02/cascadia_the_new_frontier.php
  3. ^ "About OACC Ozark Area Community Congress". OACC Ozark Area Community Congress. http://ozarkareacommunitycongress.org/. Retrieved 30 December 2011. 
  4. ^ Berg, Peter and Raymond Dasmann, "Reinhabiting California," The Ecologist 7, no. 10 (1977)
  5. ^ Anderson, Walter Truett. There's no going back to nature, Mother Jones (September/October 1996)
  6. ^ Davidson, S. (2007) "The Troubled Marriage of Deep Ecology and Bioregionalism," Environmental Values, vol. 16(3): 313-332
  7. ^ Bastedo, Jamie. Shield Country: The Life and Times of the Oldest Piece of the Planet, Red Deer Press, 1994. ISBN 0-88995-191-8
  8. ^ http://www.sustainable-city.org/intervws/berg.htm
  9. ^ http://www.sustainable-city.org/intervws/berg.htm

Further reading

External links